AMD Radeon 890M vs Intel Arc 140V: Integrated GPU Comparison and Performance

Here’s everything you need to know about gaming performance, frame rates, and benchmarks on Radeon 890M and Intel Arc 140V.

The Radeon 890M and the Intel Arc 140V are high-performance integrated GPUs for laptops, handhelds, and NUCs. In terms of real-world performance, they are almost indistinguishable. The guide below compares the two and highlights which one is better.

Table of Contents

[show]

AMD Radeon 890M vs Intel Arc 140V: Detailed Comparison

AMD Radeon 890M vs Intel Arc 140V: Detailed Comparison

Claw 8 AI+ (Image via MSI) — Claw 8 with Arc 140V (Image via MSI)

The Radeon 890M can be found in Strix Point-based chips such as Ryzen Z2 Extreme or Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. The Arc 140V is available on the Intel Lunar Lake platform, such as the MSI Claw. In terms of performance, here’s what you can expect.

Specs Comparison

Specifications	AMD Radeon 890M	Intel Arc 140V
Architecture	RDNA 3.5 (Strix Point)	Xe2 Battlemage (Lunar Lake iGPU)
Shaders / Cores	1024 (16 Compute Units)	8 Xe2 Cores
Clock Speed (Base/Boost)	800-2900 MHz	Up to 2050 MHz (Boost)
Texture Mapping Units	64	(unlisted)
Render Output Units	40	(unlisted)
Ray Tracing Cores	16 (2nd Gen)	8 Ray Tracing Units
Manufacturing Process	4nm N4P (TSMC)	3nm (TSMC)
Theoretical Performance (FP32)	5.9 TFLOPS	~6.24 TFLOPS (approximate)
Real-World Operating TFLOPS	4.1 TFLOPS (actual ~2000 MHz)	3.8 TFLOPS (actual ~1850 MHz)
Power Consumption (TDP)	15W (minimum)	30W (total system, ~15W iGPU share)
API Support	DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.3, OpenCL 2.1	DirectX 12.2, Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0

Spec-wise, these two GPUs are nearly identical in terms of compute performance. However, these two architectures are very different, and comparing them based on theoretical performance won’t paint an accurate picture.

As for their lithography, the 890M uses the very efficient N4P node from TSMC, and the 140V uses the N3B node from TSMC. In terms of power efficiency, these two are neck-and-neck.

Synthetic Performance Comparison

Xbox Ally X — The Ally X with 890M (Image via ASUS)

Benchmark	Radeon 890M	Arc 140V
3DMark Time Spy (Graphics)	~3,350 – 4,100	~3,900 – 4,300
3DMark Fire Strike (Standard)	~8,800	~8,800 – 9,000
3DMark Wild Life Extreme (Unlimited)	~6,700	~7,500
3DMark Night Raid	~37,000	~34,000 – 35,000
3DMark Solar Bay	~14,850	~14,700

When looking at synthetic performance, the two iGPUs are very close. In some instances, the 890M wins; in others, the 140V wins.

Gaming Performance Comparison

These FPS numbers are sourced from publicly available information across the internet. Most of the settings were low and implemented upscaling, meaning. Games were running at 900p internally and then were outputting a 1080p image.

Game	Radeon 890M	Arc 140V
Forza Horizon 5	60 FPS	59 FPS
The Witcher 3	37 FPS	62 FPS
Counter-Strike 2	54 FPS	42 FPS
Far Cry 6	47 FPS	50 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy	22 FPS	23 FPS
CoD: Modern Warfare III	39 FPS	42 FPS
Ghost of Tsushima	23 FPS	31 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077	23 FPS	26 FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	42 FPS	40 FPS

As we can see from the comparison, both the GPUs are close together. On some titles, the Arc 140V wins; on others, the 890M wins. It’s a draw between the two.

Final Verdict on AMD Radeon 890M vs Intel Arc 140V

If we had to pick between the two, we’d go with the 140V. There are a couple of reasons behind this, and the biggest is that devices with iGPUs have gone down in price, particularly the MSI Claw handheld. However, the 890M can be found in the Xbox All X and other expensive Ryzen AI 9 HX 370-powered laptops.

In terms of performance, both are exceptional, and there isn’t a clear winner. But from a practical standpoint, the 140V is the better one.

Read More: 5 Best GPUs for FPS Games in 2025

We provide the latest news and “How To’s” for Tech content. Meanwhile, you can check out the following articles related to PC GPUs, CPU and GPU comparisons, mobile phones, and more:

AMD Radeon 890M vs Intel Arc 140V: Integrated GPU Comparison and Performance