Facebook
Reddit
Email
Here’s everything you need to know about gaming performance, frame rates, and benchmarks on Radeon 680M and Iris Xe G7.
Both the Radeon 680M and Iris Xe G7 (96EU) are mid-range integrated GPUs for laptops. These two are very different in terms of architecture. The 680M supports Ray Tracing, whereas the Iris Xe G7 excels purely in raster rendering. The guide below compares the two and highlights which is better.
Read More: AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon 680M: Integrated GPU Comparison and Performance
AMD Radeon 680M vs Intel Iris Xe G7 (96EU): Detailed Comparison
The 680M is the flagship RDNA 2 iGPU, and is integrated into Ryzen 6000 series APUs such as the Ryzen 9 6980HX and Ryzen 7 6800H. The Iris Xe G7 (96EU) is based on Intel’s Iris Pro graphics and is found in Tiger Lake U processors, such as the Core i7 1185G7 and Core i5 1135G7.
Specs Comparison
| Specification | AMD Radeon 680M | Intel Iris Xe G7 (96 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | RDNA 2 (Rembrandt) | Xe (Gen 12, Tiger Lake GT2) |
| Shaders / Cores | 768 (12 CUs) | 96 EUs |
| Clock Speed (Boost) | ~2.2 – 2.4 GHz | ~1.10 – 1.35 GHz |
| TMUs | 48 | ~48 |
| ROPs | 32 | ~24 – 28 |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes (hardware, RDNA 2) | Limited / software |
| Manufacturing Process | TSMC 6 nm | Intel 10 nm SuperFin |
| Theoretical FP32 (approx.) | ~3.4 – 3.7 TFLOPS | ~1.7 – 2.2 TFLOPS |
| Pixel Fill Rate (approx.) | ~70 – 77 GPixel/s | ~23 – 37 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate (approx.) | ~106 – 115 GTexel/s | ~46 – 74 GTexel/s |
| Cache | ~1 MB L2 (2 MB total cluster) | Variable L3 (shared SoC) |
| Typical System TDP | 15 – 45 W | 12 – 28 W |
| API Support | DX12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.3 | DX12, Vulkan 1.3 |
| Release Date | Jan 2022 | Q3 2020 |
Spec-wise, these two architectures are very different. Based on theoretical data, it would be very unwise to compare the two. From the charts, it looks pretty neck-and-neck between the two, but strictly comparing them based on theory would paint an improper picture.
Synthetic Performance Comparison
| Benchmark | Radeon 680M | Iris Xe G7 (96EU) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy (Graphics) | 2357 | 1286 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 7498 | 4446 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3812 | 3133 |
| 3DMark Night Raid | 26725 | 14146 |
| 3DMark Solar Bay | 9500 | N/A |
| 3DMark Port Royal | 1050 | N/A |
| Geekbench 6 OpenCL | 28600 | 17300 |
From the synthetic benchmarks, we can see the magnitude of the difference. RDNA 2 is an excellent architecture, and the 680M showcases it. The aging G7 is also no slouch; it puts up remarkable scores despite being much older than the 680M.
Gaming Performance Comparison
These FPS numbers are sourced from publicly available information across the internet. Most of the settings were low and implemented upscaling, meaning. Games were running at 900p internally and then were outputting a 1080p image.
| Game | Radeon 680M | Intel Iris Xe G7 (96 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30-60 FPS | 15-30 FPS |
| The Witcher 3 | 20-40 FPS | 10-20 FPS |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 60-180+ FPS | 30-100 FPS |
| Far Cry 6 | 25-50 FPS | 12-30 FPS |
| CoD: Modern Warfare III | 25-45 FPS | 12-30 FPS |
| Ghost of Tsushima (PC) | 15-30 FPS | 10-20 FPS |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 25-45 FPS | 12-30 FPS |
| 1080p High Average (typical) | ~25-30 FPS | ~12-15 FPS |
From the gaming results, we can see that the 680M absolutely smokes the Iris Xe G7. The difference in FPS range. The difference is monumental, and in some cases, the 680M delivers 2x the frame rate of the Iris Xe.
Final Verdict on AMD Radeon 680M vs Intel Arc 140T
The 680M is the clear winner, and is the better buy overall. But that doesn’t end everything; there are quite a few essential things we want to discuss.
For starters, the Iris Xe G7 (96 EU) appears across multiple Intel mobile generations (Tiger Lake, Alder Lake, and even some Raptor Lake mobile SKUs), so you’ll still find it paired with a variety of Intel CPUs.
Suppose you’re specifically after Intel’s Arc iGPUs (Arc 140V / 140T). In this case, those are tied to Intel’s newer Core Ultra / Lunar and Arrow Lake families (Core Ultra 7 and Core Ultra 9), so you have to pick the correct SKU; manufacturers don’t always make this obvious.
That said, the Radeon 680M is still powerful enough, and you will find Ryzen 7 6000H-series devices at affordable prices.
Read More: AMD Radeon 890M vs AMD Radeon 780M: Integrated GPU Comparison and Performance
Looking For More Related to Tech?
We provide the latest news and “How To’s” for Tech content. Meanwhile, you can check out the following articles related to PC GPUs, CPU and GPU comparisons, mobile phones, and more:
- 5 Best Air Coolers for CPUs in 2025
- ASUS TUF Gaming F16 Release Date, Specifications, Price, and More
- iPhone 16e vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen): Which One To Buy in 2025?
- Powerbeats Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2: Which One To Get in 2025
- RTX 5070 Ti vs. RTX 4070 Super: Specs, Price and More Compared
- Windows 11: How To Disable Lock Screen Widgets
