The AMD Ryzen 9 9950 X3D is AMD’s fastest CPU out there, but how does the Core Ultra 9 285K stack up against it?

With the dawn of Zen 5 came the 9950X, which initially looked promising but didn’t quite pack the punch we expected. One of its two CCDs was designed with efficiency in mind, which allowed the Core Ultra 9 to outperform it in overall tasks. However, that’s not the case this time. The 9950X3D has addressed this issue—both CCDs are now high-performance, resulting in higher clocks and an improved core scheduler and driver. Yes, it’s finally here—tech enthusiasts can now find a proper replacement for their 10900Ks. If you know what I mean here, you’re probably getting goosebumps.
Note: All the data used in this comparison is sourced from official manufacturer specifications. Pricing details are taken from Newegg and are accurate as of March 23, 2025.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 9 9950 X3D – Design, Strengths, Performance, and Tradeoffs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

- Structure – Hybrid Monolithic design that combines 8P (Performance) Cores and 16 Efficiency Cores on a single die.
- Core Configuration – SMT – Simultaneous Multi-threading (Intel HT) removed from the P cores
- Lithography – TSMC N3B (3nm process node)
Strengths:
- Multi-Threaded Workloads – Offers good performance for video editing and productivity apps such as Blender / DaVinci Resolve
- CUDIMM DDR5 – Supports both DDR5 and CUDIMM variants of the DDR5
- Improved Memory Controller – Getting DDR5 8000 to work is a piece of cake.
- Intel Thread Director
- Intel DTT (Dynamic Tuning)
- AI capabilities such as support for AVX-VNNI-INT16, SHA512, SM3, and SM4 ISA instructions
- More efficient than Raptorlake
Weaknesses:
- Poor gaming performance. Struggles against Zen 5 Midrange CPUs in most titles with almost ~20% lower FPS in CPU-bound games
- Expensive Platform Costs – LGA 1851 motherboards have a hefty price tag.
- Requires heavy tuning to make up for the performance loss
- Requires a high-performance 360mm AIO to keep it cool
- Uncertain future for CPU support
- Retails at around $599.00. At that price, getting the 14900K is much better.
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

- Structure: It uses chiplets. 2 CCD (Core Complex Die): It contains 16 Zen 5 CPU cores and an I/O Die to handle connectivity (PCIe, memory controllers).
- 3D V-Cache – Stacked 96 MB V-Cache + 32 MB of cache placed below the CCD for greater thermals.
- Lithography – TSMC 4N (4nm process node).
Strengths:
- One CCD features 96 MB of stacked L3 cache (3D V-Cache) for gaming, while another has a standard 32 MB L3 cache for productivity tasks
- The fastest CPU for combined gaming and productivity
- It can pull the RTX 5090 like the 9800 X3D, but it requires some tweaking.
- AM5 is here to stay. AMD confirmed compatibility until 2027, allowing future CPU upgrades.
- Beats Arrowlake even in Multithreading
- Unlocked multiplier for further tuning
- The overall CPU binning is much better, resulting in excellent curve optimizer potential
- Insanely low power draw for a 16-Core chip
Weaknesses:
- Falls short in tasks that prefer Intel Quicksync
- As we mentioned earlier, the scheduler can be finicky. It sometimes shifts games from the 3D V-Cache CCD to the performance CCD, leading to a loss in performance if people don’t notice it
- Retail at around $699. Yep, it is expensive.
- Faster RAM compatibility like DDR5 8000 Low latency kits have a few quirks
- The X870 platform is also on the costlier side.
- Idle desktop power consumption can be an issue for some
Conclusion
In the end, if you have the budget to afford the fastest, go for it. However, if your budget is on the lower side, consider getting older generations, such as 14900K and 13900K, which perform better in gaming than Arrow Lake (Ultra 9 285K). If you are looking for an Intel-specific feature set, Arrowlake is a commendable option.
Here is a table that compares the specs between the two.
Features | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D |
Architecture | Hybrid (P+E Cores), Arrow Lake | Chiplet with 3D V-Cache, Zen 5 |
Core/Thread Count | 24 cores / 24 threads | 16 cores / 32 threads |
Base Clock | P-core: 3.7 GHz, E-core: 3.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
Boost Clock | Up to 5.7 GHz | Up to 5.7 GHz |
Cache (L3) | 36 MB | 144 MB (128 MB L3 + 16 MB L2) |
Manufacturing Process | TSMC N3B (3nm) | TSMC 4nm |
TDP (Base / Boost) | 125W / up to 250W | 170W / up to 230W |
Socket Compatibility | LGA1851 | AM5 |
Memory Support | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5600 |
PCIe Support | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
Integrated Graphics | Intel Graphics | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Price (as of March 22, 2025) | ~$600 | ~$699 |
Looking For More Related to Tech?
We provide the latest news and “How To’s” for Tech content. Meanwhile, you can check out the following articles related to PC GPUs, CPU and GPU comparisons, mobile phones, and more:
- 5 Best Air Coolers for CPUs in 2025
- ASUS TUF Gaming F16 Release Date, Specifications, Price, and More
- iPhone 16e vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen): Which One To Buy in 2025?
- Powerbeats Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2: Which One To Get in 2025
- RTX 5070 Ti vs. RTX 4070 Super: Specs, Price and More Compared
- Windows 11: How To Disable Lock Screen Widgets